Saturday, June 4, 2011

Classroom Time For The Reader Who Said: "No 'solutions' are needed as there is no problem"

Copyright Notice: If you are not reading this at All Education Matters, and unless I've explicitly given an individual or entity permission to publish my work, this post has been illegally appropriated. Please read original content here


If you have heard problematic claims made about my character, please feel free to email me about it (ccrynjohannnsen AT gmail DOT com) and avoid feeding the trolls


A reader made this incorrect statement today (see the comments):
 No 'solutions' are needed as there is no problem. Do not borrow money that you cannot repay. If you do borrow money, pay it back per the agreed loan terms or bear the consequences. 
[Note that no change in bankruptcy laws is remotely possible with Republicans in charge of the House of Reps and 60 votes needed to overcome Senate filibusters. That said, those who wish to spin their wheels trying are obviously free to do so.]
When I first began researching and writing about the student loan debt crisis, I had readers say this all the time. Frankly, I'm surprised to see it again, because things have (a) gotten so much worse and (b) our hard work is getting noticed by major media outlets (I now write for several of them, including USA Today).

Since I am an educator, I think this reader needs to be educated on the topic. Here's my response:


@Anonymous 9:32 AM - Well, I beg to differ. There are plenty of experts who agree. I talk with them on a regular basis, too. 

It's really hard for me to take this comment seriously. I have to be honest. With outstanding student loan debt at over $900 billion and fast approaching $1 trillion, you can sit there and argue that there isn't a problem? Really?

It's a systemic problem, and there are complex reasons for why we're facing a student loan debt crisis.

As for blaming the debtors. Please stop doing that. It's boring. I've heard that argument so many times. It makes me yawn. If you spoke to any student debtor - and I've now spoken with thousands and thousands of them - you'd know that they WANT to pay back their loans. But there are reasons for why it has become difficult (if you checked the news recently, the creation of jobs for the month of May was PATHETIC. A 'whopping' 54,000 jobs were created. In April? It was 38,000!).  So smart, educated folks have all these degrees, want to work, and can't find anything. (Oh, read some Stiglitz to ponder this problem further. There's something called inequity, and that's another part of the problem).

On that note of inequity . . .  

When Wall St and the banks and the hedge funds stole everything and sent the economy sliding, millions and millions of jobs were lost. Most of those jobs aren't coming back. To make matters worse, the damned government bailed out the banks (that nationalization of the banks, mind you, began under a Republican administration. That's right. Bush and his cronies SOCIALIZED the banks. Who would have ever imagined? A Republican doing socialist-y things!). So the jobs are gone, but folks still have to make ends meet. They have families to feed, rent/mortgages to pay, etc., etc. Folks also find themselves getting sick. And since our health care system is a f^%&#in' joke, they can't manage their bills if, God forbid, they become ill. Those are the hardest stories to hear. 

Then there's this philosophical issue about the importance of education. I won't get into the fact that education serves a public good (that's a serious matter, and I'll table it for now. If you're interested in hearing my thoughts on the matter, you can read my recent interview with Henry A. Giroux - http://www.truth-out.org/higher-education-under-attack-interview-henry-giroux/130319640). For now, I'll just talk about the economic side of it. If you read any recent reports/data on the matter, you'd understand this, too. For the time being, I'll just provide you a little tidbit to make this point. It comes from a recent study put out by the Young Invincibles. In Ohio, 37% of millennials without college degrees were unemployed. Conversely, 4% of millennials with degrees were unemployed. That's a pretty startling difference, don't you think? Of course, I am trying to determine if there is any data to show what sort of jobs the millennials with degrees have . . . because if they're flipping burgers or working as a maid at Hotel Corporate Crud, chances are, they aren't benefiting from their education in a tangible sense. That gets back to how silly your remarks are. Because if these folks are underemployed or working jobs that only pay minimum wage, then they're probably having a hard time paying their loans back. See, that's where people like you and me don't see eye to eye. It's clear to me, having studied sociology and history and all those 'pointless things,' that the problem affects the whole of our society. If we neglect education, scary shit starts happening (just pick up some books by good authors, and you'll find plenty of examples and case studies of what I'm talking about). If we stop educating people - and we're far behind now other countries when it comes to the percentage of folks with college degrees - then shit is just gonna get worse. It already is bad, and if you know a thing or two about uneducated countries, it ain't pretty. We're on a fast track down to third world status. Hell, in Detroit, for example, 50% of the city's population is illiterate. I don't know about you, but that's scary as hell. Study after study has shown that societies that have educated the majority of their people are healthier. Those societies are also more equitable. That means the distribution of wealth isn't out of whack. Oligarchies like Iran, Russia, and U.S. are inequitable, which means there's a whole lot of trouble as a result. 

On a more practical note, the statistics make it clear, that the most assured path to financial security is to earn a degree. It's a shame that education was invaded by corporatists (and I'm not using that in a lame, conspiracy theorist way). Education should not be a part of the market. Period. 

You're missing another key point here, too. Tuition has skyrocketed over the years, while wages for majority of Americans have stagnated (in fact, if you read anything by Robert Reich, you'd know that wages are going DOWN. They've been stagnant since the 1970s. That's pathetic when you realize that households now have two earners, and not one as they commonly did in the past). So what's the leave people with? Nothin' . . . that's why people BORROW money to go to school!

Moreover, these loan sharks have full control over the conditions of the loans, i.e., they have NEVER been regulated (because the U.S. Government gave birth to them). Because the money is guaranteed and the lenders don't have to worry about bankruptcy claims on the part of borrowers, they have no incentive to negotiate the terms of repayment. They have all the power. How's that for free market ideology?  Moreover, they mislead people - there are also many examples of lenders making deals with financial aid offices to defraud students (Cuomo busted up a few in NY, and uncovered kickbacks that financial aid officers were receiving from lenders). Not only that, they have defrauded American taxpayers (look up the case that former researcher for the DoED - Jon Oberg - just recently won for the U.S. Government. The case was settled for $58 MILLION, because the bastards figured out a loophole and got away with it under the Bush Regime). 

Do your research on the subject, and then we can talk. 


Thursday, June 2, 2011

Yet Another Anemic Move: The Whittled Down 'Gainful Employment' Rule

Copyright Notice: If you are not reading this at All Education Matters, and unless I've explicitly given an individual or entity permission to publish my work, this post has been illegally appropriated. Please read original content here

Upon further inspection, the Department's 'Gainful Employment' Rule is yet another example of how little student advocacy groups and students mean. Advocacy groups, including AEM, are not happy with the outcome. Not surprisingly, the soul- and debt-crushing schools and their lobbying leeches are peeved. Even though they played a pivotal role in reshaping this now anemic and sorry set of so-called rules, they're the victims. Because nowadays the people who are sucking the country dry, like these nasty loan leeches, are the ones who are being screwed. It's not the poor and minority students that they're misleading. Oh no! It's not them! Nope. They aren't the victims in this scenario. It's the poor, poor, eensy-weensy for-profits! Don't forget they labored and earned their billions off the backs of the indentured educated class. That's tough work. They all really deserve pats on their loanleeching backs.

Just another day in D.C. where a greedy, profit-driven industry shapes all rules and forms of legislation. If only the voices of the American people were heard a little more, but that would be just crazy!

Move along, folks. Nothing to look at here.

Good Leeches


Note to Real Leeches: Sorry, leeches, I had to use the metaphor. I don't wish to give you a bad name. I realize you are used and offer humans great health benefits, and I appreciate that. Please forgive me, and don't hit me with a defamation suit (I hope your lobbyists will understand, too)!

Related Links


"BREAKING: Department of Education Releases Gainful Employment Ruling," June 2, 2011


BREAKING: Department of Education Releases Gainful Employment Ruling

Copyright Notice: If you are not reading this at All Education Matters, and unless I've explicitly given an individual or entity permission to publish my work, this post has been illegally appropriated. Please read original content here

The official ruling on gainful employment was released by the Department of Education today (the official press release can be read here).

I agree with some sentiments I've already heard expressed, i.e. that it lacks teeth and bite, but perhaps it's a step in the right direction. I'm on the fence about it, and admittedly haven't fully reviewed the regulations and specifics of the issuance. I've been working on content related to the scumbags otherwise known as Nelnet as well as a  pivotal court case against them that was settled several months ago. (Thanks be to God for Jon Oberg).

Higher Education Watch (HEW) has done an excellent job of providing links from the press, the for-profit industry, consumer advocacy groups, and a few congressional offices. 

HEW is providing updates on on this breaking news, so interested parties can check the link above for additional information.

GUEST POST: Raymar Hampshire Talks About A New Form of Volunteering

Copyright Notice: If you are not reading this at All Education Matters, and unless I've explicitly given an individual or entity permission to publish my work, this post has been illegally appropriated. Please read original content here.


Raymar Hampshire is the CEO & Co-Founder of Sponsorchange.org. I serve as a writer for their blog, The Philanthroteer,  and as their online brand advocate. Raymar recently wrote an intriguing piece. In it, he argues that we radically rethink what it means to volunteer.


Redefining what it means to volunteer


by Raymar Hampshire

Our generation desperately needs to redefine what it means to volunteer.  I came to this realization after I conceived the idea of SponsorChange.org, which helps college students raise money to pay back their student loans by volunteering. Surprisingly, some charitable foundation members strongly criticized this idea saying, “How could you possibly pay volunteers you are cheapening service!” Some said, “Who would ever want to pay somebody to volunteer!”

I vividly recall the devastation I felt after leaving these meetings.  I was being painted as the bad guy for having the audacity to suggest that volunteers could be financially incentivized to serve, and to suggest that private citizens and corporations would be interested in sponsoring their service. However, I quickly realized something that these experts overlooked, and that was the fact that we are already paying people to volunteer.  If you have ever paid taxes you are supporting government sponsored volunteer programs.

For example, Peace Corps and many other similar government programs refer to their members as volunteers. We don’t question the altruistic nature of Peace Corps and suggest that its volunteers should not be incentivized. Peace Corps volunteers understand that their commitment to service is backed by financial incentives, including a modest living stipend, scholarships for graduate and professional school, and non-competitive eligibility when applying for government jobs just to name a few.  Although financial incentives like these often exist and factor into our decision to serve, we tend to avoid talking about them for risk of coming across as individualistic or worse having our caring called into question.

Apparently, as a society we need to be convinced that people care. We need to see tangible acts of serving to somehow validate a person’s propensity to care. We check the care box when we give large donations. We check the care box when we decide to take a small salary job with a non-profit, and we check thecare box when we freely volunteer. According to Robert Wuthnow, a sociology professor at Princeton University and author of Acts of Compassion: Caring for Others and Helping Ourself, “those who are most involved in acts of compassion are no less individualistic than anyone else–and that those who are the most intensely individualistic are no less involved in caring for others.”

We need to redefine and approach volunteering differently.  We need to abandon the self-righteousness and elitist notion that volunteering should always be purely altruistic. Indeed it is easier to volunteer out of altruism if you come from a place of privilege. But what about the millions of people who care but simply cannot afford to volunteer because they are working multiple jobs just to make the ends meet?  Financial incentives could be used more often to build pathways to volunteer opportunities.  I encourage you to think of other innovative ways to introduce incentives so that we can better mobilize our generation’s young leaders to volunteer.


Raymar Hampshire is the CEO & Founder of SponsorChange.org. His opinions are his own and do not necessarily reflect the views of All Education Matters or Ms. Cryn Johannsen.




Related Links


"To Hell with Bitterness. Here's to Collaboration and Groups who Count - Celebrating SponsorChange.org," March 7, 2011

"Work for credit to pay off student loan debt," CNN, March 4, 2011

"What it Means to Build: Edulender, SponsorChange.org, and The David & Goliath Project," February 11, 2011


"SponsorChange's New Campaign: 'The Big Pay Back!' Are You Involved Yet?," August 17, 2010

"Interview with Raymar Hampshire," August 3, 2010








Wednesday, June 1, 2011

Online Corporate Whore News Reports: Nelnet's In The Resume Writin' Biz!

Copyright Notice: If you are not reading this at All Education Matters, and unless I've explicitly given an individual or entity permission to publish my work, this post has been illegally appropriated. Please read original content here.

Online CW News writes, "ResumeEdge, a Nelnet company and leading online provider of resume writing services, today published a new resource, 'Five Ways to Capitalize on Your Skills.' The certified resume writers at ResumeEdge compiled tips to help job seekers differentiate themselves through resume writing and job interviewing."

So, they've screwed thousands and thousands and thousands of students in the loan sharkin' business, and are now diving into the resume writin' biz! (They also were recently sued and lost, but no matter . . . We'll let them get into this area of business as well as the financial literacy industry).

Nelnet knows that there is money to made off of millions of unemployed and desperate people who will shell out money for so-called 'resume experts.' These experts are more like leeches, sucking money out of people who don't have a chance at getting a job in a global economy that appears to be on the brink of collapse. The WSJ reported today that in May, the private sector added a whopping 38,000 new jobs. Yeah, so, unemployed people - it's your fault that you're jobless. That number clearly shows that there are plenty of jobs out there for you! That's why you need to take advantage of these bullshit services, because they're certainly not screwing you or anything.

Once these people have their resumes made all squeaky clean,  know how to wear the right suit to that job interview, and have these money sucking leeches removed, they will hit the pavement and discover that there are NO job interviews out there, because there are NO jobs out there. Rest assured, Nelnet will make a nice amount of money off these unemployed folks! Luckily, the government is taking the right measures and CUTTING everything. Because we unedumacated folks have been taught to believe that budget cuts and tax cuts create jobs - that's what the wizards on the Hill be tellin' us. God Bless the Neoliberals in Amerika.

1930s in the U.S.

2000s in the U.S.


Related Links

"Nelnet News," May 10, 2010